{"id":54761,"date":"2019-01-11T13:48:39","date_gmt":"2019-01-11T19:48:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ministryofhemp.com\/?p=54761"},"modified":"2019-01-11T13:48:39","modified_gmt":"2019-01-11T19:48:39","slug":"hemp-by-mail","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ministryofhemp.com\/hemp-by-mail\/","title":{"rendered":"Hemp By Mail: Recent Court Rulings Enable Mailing Industrial Hemp"},"content":{"rendered":"
Recent court rulings make it clear that it’s fully legal to send hemp by mail.<\/p>\n
History has been made in recent weeks. With industrial hemp becoming federally legal under the 2018 Farm Bill<\/a>, new rules and regulations surrounding the industry will begin to appear. Another important change? New rulings from the Judicial Officer and the Federal Court for the U.S. Postal Service now allow shipments of industrial hemp — specifically, hemp-derived CBD<\/a> derived products — through USPS.<\/span><\/p>\n Courtney N. Moran, founding principal of EARTH Law, LLC<\/a>, has vigorously fought multiple battles for these rights. Still, as can be expected, there remain problems and misunderstandings about legal hemp. And Moran will have to continue her battle until these issues are fully solved.<\/span><\/p>\n We recently had the opportunity to have a conversation with Moran in which we sought to learn more about these battles, their resolutions, and what people can expect when attempting to ship hemp in the future.<\/span><\/p>\n After Moran received complaints from clients entailing how their hemp products weren\u2019t being shipped to their respected destinations, she filed multiple cases. The goal of these cases was to establish a federal judicial precedent which:<\/span><\/p>\n Cases like the recent “<\/span>KaB, LLC v. USPS”<\/span>\u00a0established these necessary precedents. In this case, USPS seized a package of CBD derived from a hemp agriculture pilot program with the excuse, \u201cthe parcel [was] emitting an odor of a controlled substance.\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n When this case was brought to court, the question arose whether or not \u201cCBD grown or cultivated from industrial hemp pursuant to a pilot program established by Congress under the Agriculture Act of 2014 is nonmailable as a Schedule I controlled substance.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Moran\u2019s argument was that the hemp was grown in compliance with an agricultural pilot program established under the 2014 Farm Bill. This hemp is exempt from control under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). Therefore, the hemp is not a controlled substance and is allowed to be mailed.<\/span><\/p>\n There was a lot of legal back and forth. For though it\u2019s confirmed legal to ship hemp in accordance with agriculture programs, there remains much confusion in postal service policy. At the end of the day, the entire country hasn\u2019t woken up from decades of hemp prohibition. Solving this confusion ultimately lies in separating hemp from psychoactive cannabis (“marijuana”)<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n Ultimately, the court agreed with Moran\u2019s argument about sending hemp by mail. She won a great leap forward for this industry with this important ruling. Here’s how she described her success:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019ve covered 16 cases with the Postal Service,\u201d Moran explained. \u201cAll of them had been decided in our favor. And all of those folks either received their packages back already or they\u2019ve gone on their way to be received from the recipient.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nTHE LEGAL BATTLE OVER SENDING HEMP BY MAIL<\/b><\/h3>\n
\n
A WIN FOR THE INDUSTRY<\/b><\/h3>\n